A book of abstract algebra / Charles C. Pinter. — Dover ed . In an introductory chapter entitled Why Abstract Algebra?, as well as in numerous historical asides. Best selection of my books, common to all. Contribute to MurugeshMarvel/Books development by creating an account on GitHub. The first abstract algebraic system–the Group–is considered in Chapter 9. in a high school English class, for example, could work with the book over If you.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Portuguese|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration needed]|
Download or Read Online eBook a book of abstract algebra pinter pdf in PDF Format From The Best User Guide. Database. This book does nothing less than. A BOOK OF ABSTRACT ALGEBRA Charles C. Pinter Professor of Mathematics Bucknell University McGraw-Hill Book Company New York St. Louis San. [Charles C. Pinter] a Book of Abstract Algebra - Ebook download as PDF File . pdf) or read book online. A book of abstract algebra by Charles Pinter.
The best part? As a Chegg Study subscriber, you can view available interactive solutions manuals for each of your classes for one low monthly price. Why download extra books when you can get all the homework help you need in one place?
You bet! Just post a question you need help with, and one of our experts will provide a custom solution. You can also find solutions immediately by searching the millions of fully answered study questions in our archive. You can download our homework help app on iOS or Android to access solutions manuals on your mobile device. Asking a study question in a snap - just take a pic.
Textbook Solutions. Looking for the textbook?
We have solutions for your book! Generators and Defining Relations. Cay ley Diagrams. Center of a Group. Group Codes; Hamming Code.
Composite and Inverse of Functions. Finite-State Machines. Automata and Their Semigroups. Chapter 7 Groups of Permutations Symmetric Groups. Dihedral Groups. An Application of Groups to Anthropology.
Even and Odd Permutations. Alternating Groups. Isomorphic and Nonisomorphic Groups. Group Automorphisms. Laws of Exponents. Properties of the Order of Group Elements. Evariste Galois always intrigued me. He died aged 20 in a duel supposably for some love story, yet he apparently had "time" to lay the foundations of some pretty serious math.
To quote the into from the last chapter of this book which introduces Galois Theory: It was Galois, however, who provided the full explanation by showing which polynomials could and could not be solved by formulas. He discovered the connection between groups and field extensions. Galois theory demonstrates the strong interdependence of group and field theory, and has had far-reaching implications beyond its original purpose. I wonder how he would have turned out if he had not passed away so young.
Surprisingly, the only other mathematician that died really young aka younger than jim morrison and co is Niels Henrik Abel, also mentioned in the quote. Makes you wonder how healthy algebra is, doesn't it ;p. Gallian had a lot of examples and felt very much like the textbooks I used in high schools colorful, lots of prose, etc. It is incredibly easy to get into, but sometimes you've understood something and you don't need 25 more examples.
Herstein and Judson were both a less verbose sometimes to the point of being unhelpful , but I'd still recommend them. I think I learned a lot from being exposed to different books.
I could always look at another book if one book's explanations, examples, proofs, exercises were an issue. The Math Stackexchange was also invaluable because many of the proofs I saw there were very different from the ones I saw in class or in textbooks. Gallian's Contemporary Abstract Algebra is the book I used. I really loved the subject. I had an awesome teacher that did a lot to inspire, but this was a good book. So download the 5th edition. One of the perks of being able to self learn is that these sorts of revenue models don't impact you: I've used Gallian.
Not sure what's in the 7th edition but the 5th is perfectly good. I used to date a textbook marketing manager. It was a joke internally, too. You forgot the part where you rearrange the questions so that students have to get the latest edition to be able to get the correct question 2 on their assignment. MaysonL on Mar 11, I used to read textbooks for Reading For the Blind and Dyslexic, and in a number of cases I found that the solutions in the back of the book were not for the same exercises in the front.
Somebody had rearranged the exercises, but not the solutions. CalChris on Mar 11, I still have my copy. It's also bad.
It was Herstein's Abstract Algebra 3ed. I used it as a supplement to my undergrad algebra classes and found it to be very useful. This is in contrast to some books like Artin which leave a lot to the readers, while not necessarily bad, are sometimes difficult for self-study. I've learned from both in various undergrad and grad courses and I have to say I like Artin better.
Because you used it as a supplement. Koshkin on Mar 10, I can recommend an inexpensive little book by Pinter, which is one of the most student-friendly abstract algebra books on the market. Loved this book. Yes, Pinter's little book is very accessible.
It's a wonderful little book. I was just reading it again this morning. Here's my very basic attempt to visualize some of the key structures: Is anyone aware of something similar, but much more comprehensive? Chinjut on Mar 11, One slight correction: I've almost-exclusively seen "Commutative Groups" referred to as "Abelian Groups". Is there a reason you use "Commutative Groups"?
I'll admit my algebra is quite limited and I may be missing a subtlety. There is no subtlety here. That groups which are commutative are referred to as "abelian" is purely historical.
Refering to them as commutative helps understanding for people who are not fammillar with them, and helps highlight the structural simmilarity that the diagram is attempting to show. Sadly, I find it unlikely that we will get mathamaticians to agree to stop calling them Abelian groups, so learners will have to learn that name eventually.
That's why I always call it partition sort instead of quicksort. For those who prefer dead trees, the hardcover is miraculously inexpensive: Since everyone is pitching their favorite books on abstract algebra, here's mine: I'd love to hear what differentiates this book. Why should I read this one instead of the existing options? Is it because Sage is used? When I was a physics major at UCI the abstract algebra course ended up being my favorite course.
The prof was young, and a real hard ass. Apart from the usual, he forced us to memorize proofs and regurgitate them for tests, as well as come up with original proofs.
That might sound draconian it certainly did to me; none of my real analysis classes asked that of us but it turned out to be really hard to do unless you understood the entire proof. And it also turns out that if you understand a proof, or a set of them, you can produce new ones. Of course, almost everyone failed the course. One guy got an A, a couple of us got C's I was one and the rest got F's. Never been prouder of a C in my life. Smaug on Mar 10, Your analysis exams didn't require bookwork?
For someone who has done four years of maths at Cambridge, this idea is dumbfounding: Except, in my year, Category Theory, in which there was no bookwork at all. Of course I don't hold a grudge about how much time I spent learning the proofs of the monadicity- and adjoint-functor theorems. I'd be appalled if a third of an exam was "reproduce this proof of this theorem".
However, if a third of the exam is "Produce a proof of this theorem" and people don't care about whether the proof is original or reproduced, that seems fine. Certainly, being able to proof any theorems your rely on is important. But being able to recall how any given theorem was proven in a book isn't important. Sure, but there's usually a reason a particular proof is used in lectures: Not sure what you mean by "bookwork".
Is that what memorizing proofs is called in the UK?